@Dashrender said in Domain Planning: Network shares or ,..:

@dafyre said in Domain Planning: Network shares or ,..:

@notverypunny said in Domain Planning: Network shares or ,..:

Does NC allow exposure of their "file shares" as smb? If you have users that can't / don't want to use a browser-based access they can always mount it in windows explorer via webdav. Alfresco allows (allowed?) access via both, but the last time I played with it the performance was meh, which I attributed to it being built on java...

You can mount NextCloud into a drive letter or folder using WebDav.

The question does become the aforementioned performance issue (if there is one).

I wonder how file locks are handled when using WebDav?

There are a few topics elsewhere here where file locking and cloud hosting were discussed. You do have to give up what we have all come to appreciate in file locking. Here is a response in one of those other topics I spoke about:

@scottalanmiller said in file sharing in the 21st century:

@Donahue said in file sharing in the 21st century:

I am aware of that. It's online locking that I am after. Though, I will concede that any locking scheme has to plan for both online and offline. I like sync because of local performance and offline availability, but it really feels like it is best for non shared files. When you add multiple users into the mix, almost everything goes out the window, especially when and if they go offline.

Everything is best for non-shared files 🙂

SMB shines at "always online, always nearly local" files because it handles offline so poorly. It's a balance. To handle offline or very distant (e.g. high latency) networks well, you have to sacrifice locking.

@gjacobse said in Server 2008 Exchange 2010: Event 1009:

Nearly all of the Exchange issues I deal with right now really come from O365.

However I was asked about Exchange Mail Submission server that was throwing Event 1009, and effectively stopping mail flow. What he found via forum (not ML) searching was 'a back pressure issue, but the Event Log wasn't logging in back pressure messages'

While it's been four years since directly touching a Exchange system, the term 'back pressure' is not one I have heard before.

However, looking up Exchange Event 1009 give me a few options including limited disk space.

Has anyone come across the term 'Back Pressure' with Exchange in the past?

Yes, it is when the server is running out of space or resources for delivery of incoming emails

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/exchange/mail-flow/back-pressure

@gjacobse

You should just need to run this bit, nothing should have to be changed. DFL should be at least 2008

# Imports Active Directory information Import-Module Activedirectory $credentials = Get-Credential # Prompts for user credentials default user is “ ”, enter an administrator account in the form of “domain-name\administrator-account” Get-ADUser -Credential $credentials -Filter * -Properties DisplayName,EmailAddress,memberof,DistinguishedName,Enabled | % { New-Object PSObject -Property @{ UserName = $_.DisplayName EmailAddress = $_.EmailAddress DistinguishedName = $_.DistinguishedName Enabled = $_.Enabled # Deliminates the document for easy copy and paste using ";" as the delimiter. Incredibly useful for Copy & Paste of group memberships to new hire employees. Groups = ($_.memberof | Get-ADGroup | Select -ExpandProperty Name) -join ";" } # The export path is variable change to desired location on domain controller or end user computer. } | Select UserName,EmailAddress,@{l='OU';e={$_.DistinguishedName.split(',')[1].split('=')[1]}},Groups,Enabled | Sort-Object Username | Export-Csv $ENV:UserProfile\Documents\User-Permissions.csv –NTI

@thwr said in Flushing GPOs:

@dbeato said in Flushing GPOs:

You need to setup the settings to Delete or changed to not configured, wait until it applies and then delete the GPOs after confirming they are not applied any longer.

Get-Content c:\temp\gpos.txt | foreach { Get-GPO -Name "$_" | Remove-GPO }

http://jeffwouters.nl/index.php/2013/08/remove-group-policy-objects-through-powershell/

I bet you could do something like this to set all GPOs to "on delete remove from client" too

This assumes a txt file with all GPO names. You could also just use Get-GPO

@fateknollogee said in Server 2008 w Hyper-V infrastructure: needs upgrades!!:

@tim_g said in Server 2008 w Hyper-V infrastructure: needs upgrades!!:

This was on a MD1000, very old.

MD1000...old school! I know those units. I've got 2 of them in storage gathering dust!

I have 2x LSI 620J. I might just connect it with LSI 9207E HBA

If you don't mind the 3 gbps bus, the MD1000s are amazing.